Disappointed, 
I left Bombay and went to Rajkot where I set up my own office. Here 
I got along moderately well. Drafting applications and memorials 
brought me in, on an average, Rs 300 a month. For this work I had to 
thank influence rather than my own ability, for my brother's partner 
had a settled practice. All applications etc. which were, really or 
to his mind, of an important character, he sent to big barristers. 
To my lot fell the applications to be drafted on behalf of his poor 
clients.
I must confess that here I had to compromise the principle of giving no 
commission, which in Bombay I had so scrupulously observed. I was 
told that conditions in the two cases were different; that whilst in 
Bombay commissions had to be paid to touts, here they had to be paid 
to vakils who briefed you; and that here as in Bombay all 
barristers, without exception, paid a percentage of their fees as 
commission. The argument of my brother was, for me, unanswerable. 
'You see,' said he, 'that I am in partnership with another vakil. I 
shall always be inclined to make over to you all our cases with 
which you can possibly deal, and if you refuse to pay a commission 
to my partner, you are sure to embarrass me. As you and I have a 
joint establishment, your fee comes to our common purse, and I 
automatically get a share. But what about my partner? Supposing he 
gave the same case to some other barrister he would certainly get 
his commission from him.' I was taken in by this plea, and felt 
that, if I was to practise as a barrister, I could not press my 
principle regarding commissions in such cases. That is how I argued 
with myself, or to put it bluntly, how I deceived myself. Let me 
add, however, that I do not remember ever to have given commission 
in respect of any other case.
Though I thus began to make both ends meet, I got the first shock of my life 
about this time. I had heard what a British officer was like, but up 
to now had never been face to face with one.
My brother had been secretary and adviser to the late Ranasaheb of 
Porbandar before he was installed on his gadi1, 
and hanging over his head at this time was the charge of having 
given wrong advice when in that office. The matter had gone to the 
Political Agent who was prejudiced against my brother. Now I had 
known this officer when in England, and he may be said to have been 
fairly friendly to me. My brother thought that I should avail myself 
of the friendship and, putting in a good word on his behalf, try to 
disabuse the Political Agent of his prejudice. I did not at all like 
this idea. I should not, I thought, try to take advantage of a 
trifling acquaintance in England. If my brother was really at fault, 
what use was my recommendation? If he was innocent, he should submit 
a petition in the proper course and, confident of his innocence, 
face the result. My brother did not relish this advice. 'You do not 
know Kathiawad', he said, 'and you have yet to know the world. Only 
influence counts here. It is not proper for you, a brother, to shirk 
your duty, when you can clearly put in a good word about me to an 
officer you know.'
I could not refuse him, so I went to the officer much against my will. I 
knew I had no right to approach him and was fully conscious that I 
was compromising my self-respect. But I sought an appointment and 
got it. I reminded him of the old acquaintance, but I immediately 
saw that Kathiawad was different from England; that an officer on 
leave was not the same as an officer on duty. The political Agent 
owned the acquaintance, but the reminder seemed to stiffen him. 
'Surely you have not come here to abuse that acquaintance, have 
you?' appeared to be the meaning of that stiffness, and seemed to be 
written on his brow. Nevertheless I opened my case. The sahib was 
impatient. 'Your brother is an intriguer. I want to hear nothing 
more from you. I have no time. If your brother has anything to say, 
let him apply through the proper channel.' The answer was enough, 
was perhaps deserved. But selfishness is blind. I went on with my 
story. The sahib got up and said: 'You must go now.'
'But please hear me out,' said I. That made him more angry. He called his 
peon and ordered him to show me the door. I was still hesitating 
when the peon came in, placed his hands on my shoulders and put me 
out of the room.
The sahib went away as also the peon, and I departed, fretting and fuming. I at once 
wrote out and sent over a note to this effect: 'You have insulted 
me. You have assaulted me through your peon. If you make no amends, 
I shall have to proceed against you.'
Quick came the answer through his sowar:
'You were rude to me. I asked you to go and you would not. I had no option but 
to order my peon to show you the door. Even after he asked you to 
leave the office, you did not do so. He therefore had to use just 
enough force to send you out. You are at liberty to proceed as you 
wish.'
With this answer in my pocket, I came home crest-fallen, and told my brother 
all that had happened. He was grieved, but was at a loss as to how 
to console me. He spoke to his vakil friends. For I did not know how 
to proceed against the sahib. 
Sir Pherozeshah Mehta happened to be in Rajkot at this time, having 
come down from Bombay for some case. But how could a junior 
barrister like me dare to see him? So I sent him the papers of my 
case, through the vakil who had engaged him, and begged for his 
advice. 'Tell Gandhi,' he said, 'such things are the common 
experience of many vakils and barristers. He is still fresh from 
England, and hot-blooded. He does not know British officers. If he 
would earn something and have an easy time here, let him tear up the 
note and pocket the insult. He will gain nothing by proceeding 
against the sahib, and on the contrary will very likely ruin himself. Tell him he has 
yet to know life.'
The advice was as bitter as poison to me, but I had to swallow it. I 
pocketed the insult, but also profited by it. 'Never again shall I 
place myself in such a false position, never again shall I try to 
exploit friendship in this way,' said I to myself, and since then I 
have never been guilty of a breach of that determination. This shock 
changed the course of my life.